skip to content
home / solutions / skills assessments at scale

assessments that go live in weeks, not quarters

role-aligned, gamified assessments that baseline what your workforce can actually do, across knowledge, skills, abilities, and behavior, and feed every talent decision that follows.

get started →

the challenge today

today, your skills data is whatever people typed in

self-declared profiles run most talent decisions: staffing, succession, learning spend. assessment replaces the guess with evidence.

the profile says“python: expert.” self-rated, three years ago.
the assessment showsproficiency 2 of 4 against the role bar. gap routed into a development plan automatically.
the profile says“strong people leader.” unverified.
the assessment showsbehavioral profile: delegation strong, feedback avoidant. a coaching focus, not a promotion blocker.
the profile says“cloud-ready team.” nobody has checked.
the assessment showsteam baseline at 61% of the market bar, hotspot flagged on the talent map, learning paths assigned.

AI-powered skill assessments

skill assessments built for the role, not pulled from a question bank

every assessment starts from what the role requires in axon, so it tests the skills that matter at the level the job needs.

AI builds it in a fraction of the time and keeps refining it as results come in.

1design

the role sets the blueprint

  • role, skills and expected proficiency come straight from the role's axon profile
  • what gets measured is fixed before a single question exists
2validate

AI writes the question bank

  • questions and scenarios generated for those skills, at those proficiency levels
  • every question mapped to a skill and a level, so nothing generic slips in
3assess

your experts approve it

  • subject matter experts review every set for relevance and accuracy
  • only the approved set becomes the live instrument
4improve

it adapts, scores and learns

  • adaptive delivery matched to the role and the proficiency it demands
  • automated scoring returns skill-level proficiency, and the gaps flow back into axon

generic tests measure generic knowledge. ours measure the role.

cognitive, personality and behavioural instruments can sit alongside the skill baseline where a role calls for them.

from one role to the whole enterprise, without a testing season

design against the role, not a question bank

every assessment is generated from the role's axon profile: its tasks, its KPIs, its market-benchmarked skills. relevance is structural, not curated by hand.

Skills Assessment Agent, an entomo agent for role-aligned assessments at scalethe Skills Assessment Agent designs the evaluation sets
run it where people already are

gamified, mobile-first, and self-paced, combining self-appraisal with scientific instruments, so completion doesn't depend on chasing.

results land where decisions happen

scores flow back into axon: talent hotspots and nine-box grids for leaders, proficiency gaps into individual development plans, aggregate baselines into workforce planning. no report to distribute; the graph updates.

India's patent examiners, benchmarked before and after capacity building

government · India · Mission Karmayogi

a baseline and an end-line assessment for newly inducted patent examiners, built from role blueprints and benchmarked to one national competency framework.

led by the CEGIS Foundation, knowledge partner of the Capacity Building Commission, with the Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks under the Ministry of Commerce and Industry. examiners across 14 disciplines and four regional zones sat scenario-based assessments on eight functional and behavioural competency domains, aligned to the FRAC framework of Mission Karmayogi. delivered proctored and paperless on entomo's platform, with near-time analytics feeding individual development plans and capability planning.

read the case study →
14 disciplinesof patent examiners across four regional zones, under one competency framework
baseline + end-lineassessments built from role-specific blueprints on eight competency domains
FRAC-alignedproficiency benchmarks, with results flowing to development plans and capability planning

the questions assessment programs live or die on

will employees actually take them?

This is the failure mode of most programs, which is why the experience is gamified, mobile, and role-relevant. When an assessment reads like your actual job rather than a generic quiz, completion follows.

what happens to the results?

They go to work. Each gap routes into an individual development plan with learning attached; aggregates surface as talent hotspots and nine-box views for leaders. The assessment is the beginning of a development loop, not an annual filing exercise.

who sees an individual's scores?

Access is role-governed down to the individual, on a platform certified to ISO/IEC 27001:2022. Employees see their own profile and growth path; leaders see the aggregates they govern.

can this validate our competency framework?

Yes, and it should. Assessments test the framework against reality: where measured proficiency and the framework disagree, you learn something about both. Run together, they give you an architecture backed by evidence. see competency framework creation →

how are skill assessments built for a role?

the role sets the blueprint. entomo starts from what the role requires in axon, generates the question bank with AI, has your own experts approve it, then adapts, scores and learns from every cycle. generic tests measure generic knowledge. these measure the role.

measure once, then decide with evidence everywhere

assessment intelligence on the platform trusted by millions of users, Forrester-validated at 103% ROI over three years.

see an assessment built for your roles →